Columbus turning its back on neighborhood’s wishes
Saturday, January 01, 2005
Our community should be disheartened by the recent report in The
Dispatch that the Columbus City Council and Mayor Michael B. Coleman
had decided to fly in the face of a local neighborhood association.
It agreed to sell land for peanuts at the northeast corner of
Hamilton Avenue and E. Long Street for the development of an
unwanted and needless office building, at considerable expense to
Columbus taxpayers.
The King-Lincoln-Bronzeville Neighborhood Association, of which I am
a member, is opposed to the city’s sale of land at that corner for
$32,000 to the Gideon Development Partners. An office building is
the wrong idea.
This building seems to be a pet project of Coleman — he even showed
up at a City Council meeting on its behalf. An office building would
be a repetition of the bad news at the corner of Cleveland and 11 th
avenues, compliments of our city planners and some of our
politicians. A great deal of money was spent at that location to
build buildings, only to discover that the corner is a wasteland
after 5 p.m. This kind of development should not be repeated.
This sort of development is not the model for building a viable
neighborhood and raises the question of whether the city will ever
learn from its mistakes.
The neighborhood association has developed a proposal that would
advance the development of a vital urban environment in an area that
desperately needs it. Unfortunately, its ideas have been ignored by
the mayor and his staff.
The association has proposed a mixed-use project that includes,
first and foremost, residential units (condominiums), along with
retail and office components, based on its belief that what the
neighborhood needs first is people, not just bricks and mortar. When
you have people, you encourage the development of services people
need, such as coffee houses, restaurants, dry cleaners, florists,
entertainment venues and stores.
The mayor’s office does not appear to understand these concepts. If
it did, it would not insist on pushing an office building opposed by
the very people who will have to live with this bad idea for decades
to come.
It is not difficult to become suspicious of the mayor’s intentions
when considering other circumstances of the proposed Gideon group
project. For example, the city is proposing to lease 28,212 square
feet of space in the building at an annual escalating rent of
$383,000 (at $13.57 per square foot), plus utilities. Why would the
city agree to pay this much money when it could house the Internal
Affairs Bureau of the Division of Police nearby in an existing
building for far less money?
In fact, there are more than 50,000 square feet of vacant and
available office space within 1,000 feet of that intersection.
Further, at an alternative location, the city would not be required
to help finance the building’s leasehold improvements to the tune of
$675,000 and would not have to grant a 10-year, 75 percent real-
estate tax abatement to the detriment of our school system, both of
which the city has agreed to do for the Gideon project.
What in the world is the mayor, his administration and the council
thinking about?
Because of the misdirection coming from city government, I believe
the neighborhood association should do everything in its power to
serve the best interest of its neighborhood, as all neighborhoods
should do.
After all, wasn’t that one of the central planks in Coleman’s
platform? Hasn’t he been advocating the importance of neighborhoods,
including Downtown, “everyone’s neighborhood”?
If he were wise, he would work to harness, not to contradict, the
power that neighborhoods can bring to their own revitalization.
That, in the end, is what is really needed and is most effective and
efficient. Anything else is not only counterproductive but wasteful
and inefficient.
I would not be surprised to learn that the mayor has too much
political capital invested in the Gideon project to change course. I
urge the King-Lincoln-Bronzeville Neighborhood Association to use
all the legal means at its disposal to stop the Gideon project,
including filing an injunction to allow for a complete
reconsideration of what is truly in the best interest of the
neighborhood.
WILLIAM FULLARTON
Columbus